# The Nature of Returns

Through the years I have sought to improve my returns. Initially I sought market knowledge; then I focused on self-awareness and knowledge of self – I especially looked for ways to improve my decision making skills. Nowadays, I focus at improving my net returns by delving into the nuances of the Expectancy Return and Expectancy Ratio.

There are quite a few variations of both formulae floating around. For Expectancy Return I use:

(Avg\$ Win x Win Rate) – (Avg\$Loss x Loss Rate) = expected \$ Return.

Where:

• Avg\$Win = Profitable \$ Returns/Total Winning Trades
• Avg\$Loss = Losing \$ Returns/Losing Trades

I have explained elsewhere (The Art of Position Sizing) that I prefer to normalize my results by using percentage of the price that initiated the trade. But for this blog. let’s use the idea with which most are comfortable: \$ Return.

Note also that the above formula can be summarised to (Total-Losing\$)/Total Trades; but while the results would be the same, the first rendition separates two important components:

1. The Avg\$Win and Avg\$Loss: these are the result of our entry and exit and are totally within our control. And,
2. The WinRate and LossRate: these are more a factor of the interaction of the Ebb and Flow of our plan and the Market. (For ‘Ebb and Flow’, see (The Art of Position Sizing).

If we understand how important (1) is to our being profitable, we’ll tailor our trade management and position sizing according to its statistical history.

Most times we manage trades based on our perception of the technical and/or the fundamental picture. The Ray Wave, for example, provides an objectively definable edge in identifying where a swing structure may end. (See The Ray Wave I). But maximization of our profit lies less with the Ray Wave’s intricacies than with understanding our profit/loss profile.

For example if we have a 40% hit rate; and Avg\$Win of \$75.00 with an Avg\$Loss of \$50, we have no edge i.e. over a large sample size, we’ll not make or lose money. But if we can raise the Avg\$win to \$100, we can expect to make \$10.00 per trade.

We can take the Expectancy Return and turn it into a ratio:

(Ave\$win x WinRate)/(Avg\$Loss x Loss Rate) = Expectancy Ratio

Now taking that information we reconcile the idioms:

1. Never let a winning trade turn into a loss. And,

Once we know the minimum ratio we need to provide an edge of ‘x’, we don’t have a winning trade until the minimum ratio is reached. For example, if our minimum ratio for an edge is 1.5, and we have risked \$100 on this trade, we need to see at least \$150.00 in open profits before we can say we have a winning trade. Once that objective is attained we implement our defensive strategies to let our profits run. The strategies may involve partial exits (like my Rule of 3) or bringing the trailing stop to breakeven etc.

This is not to say that on occasions, we’ll not exit a position before attaining our minimum ratio – there will be times when we perceive that market conditions have changed and we need to exit. The key words are, ‘on occasions’. If we consistently take profits before attaining our minimum historical ratio, then, in the long run, we must be unprofitable.

Tomorrow I’ll examine how these ideas have led to the amending of my Rule of 3 See (Rule of 3); I’ll also examine their application to John Sweeney’s Maximum Adverse and Maximum Favourable Excursions.

## 6 thoughts on “The Nature of Returns”

1. Ray

Following the nature of returns as you put it, I would like to share here with readers what Tim Morge did advocate:

Quote:
I have been a professional trader now for 35 years. I’ve probably made every mistake that can be made and broken most
of the trading rules that can be brokenâ€” except one very important set of rules:

1. Always have stop loss orders in place when you open any position.

3. When you find yourself out of step with the market, close all your positions immediately and walk away from that
market. Then take a break from trading.
Unquote

With Retail Sales and Jobless Claims due out tomorrow, I have closed all positions and am walking away from the market to take a breather.

2. baz says:

Speaking of the Ray Wave,have you ever contemplated using one of the contemporary indicators available to assist in Ray Wave structural analysis at key points? With the view to enhancing the accuracy.If you were to toy with the idea further and experiment where would be a good starting point keeping in mind the primary goal of risk management.Sincerely Baz

3. ray says:

Hi Baz

I am not a fan of indicators if you mean tools like the stochastics, MACDs etc. I do look at sentiment indicators, stats, and cycles, all of which do assist.

4. Ray

Saying one thing and doing another seems to be what a trader does best!

While I could not walk away from my trading platform, the moment the market came to me with a trigger to short ES, I took a challenge, entering at 1330.

The Market Delta footprints showed it was going my way and when they started to turn green, probably with the locals having a jolly good time during lunchbreak, I decided to take some money off the table, leaving some, as I wanted to hit the sack by 1AM, my local Singtime.

I am flat again and looking at GC and QM tonight before the figures are due, especially the CPI on Friday.

5. baz says:

Thankyou Ray,I guessed as much.Thats a very solid approach and there is some wisdom in cycles too.Perhaps in a future blog you might care to expand upon this a little more if you havent already done so. Also i would like to take this opportunity to thankyou for providing such an informative and interesting blog site.Nobody reading it could possibly be not enriched on a professional or personal level. Thankyou and best wishes Baz

6. ray says:

Thanks Baz for your compliments – much appreciated.

Sure I’ll go through my NOT matrix in a little in a not too distant blog.